<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=74.111.185.131</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=74.111.185.131"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.111.185.131"/>
	<updated>2026-05-02T05:16:33Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Mittag-leffler_distribution&amp;diff=30110</id>
		<title>Mittag-leffler distribution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=Mittag-leffler_distribution&amp;diff=30110"/>
		<updated>2014-01-04T17:40:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;74.111.185.131: /* The Mittag-Lefler function */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[mathematics]], the &#039;&#039;&#039;Segal–Bargmann space&#039;&#039;&#039; (for [[Irving Segal]] and [[Valentine Bargmann]]), also known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;Bargmann space&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;Bargmann–Fock space&#039;&#039;&#039;, is the space of [[holomorphic]] functions &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; complex variables satisfying the square-integrability condition:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|F\|^2 := \pi^{-n} \int_{C^n} |F(z)|^2 \exp(-|z|^2)\,dz &amp;lt; \infty,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where here &#039;&#039;dz&#039;&#039; denotes the 2&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;-dimensional Lebesgue measure on &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. It is a Hilbert space with respect to the associated inner product:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \langle F\mid G\rangle = \pi^{-n} \int_{C^n} \overline{F(z)}G(z)\exp(-|z|^2)\,dz. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The space was introduced in the mathematical physics literature separately by Bargmann and Segal in the early 1960s; see {{harvtxt|Bargmann|1961}} and {{harvtxt|Segal|1963}}. Basic information about the material in this section may be found in {{harvtxt|Folland|1989}} and {{harvtxt|Hall|2000}}. Segal worked from the beginning in the infinite-dimensional setting; see {{harvtxt|Baez|Segal|Zhou|1992}} and Section 10 of {{harvtxt|Hall|2000}} for more information on this aspect of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Properties ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A basic property of this space is that &#039;&#039;pointwise evaluation is continuous&#039;&#039;, meaning that for each &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, there is a constant &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039; such that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |F(a)|&amp;lt; C\|F\|. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It then follows from the [[Riesz representation theorem]] that there exists a unique &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; in the Segal–Bargmann space such that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; F(a) = \langle F_a\mid F\rangle. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The function &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; may be computed explicitly as&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; F_a(z) = \exp(\overline{a}\cdot z) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where, explicitly,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \overline{a}\cdot z = \sum_{j=1}^n \overline{a_j}z_j. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The function &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is called the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[coherent state]]&#039;&#039;&#039; with parameter &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;, and the function &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \kappa(a,z) := \overline{F_a(z)} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
is known as the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[reproducing kernel]]&#039;&#039;&#039; for the Segal–Bargmann space. Note that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; F(a) = \langle F_a\mid F\rangle = \pi^{-n} \int_{C^n} \kappa(a,z)F(z)\exp(-|z|^2)\,dz,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
meaning that integration against the reproducing kernel simply gives back (i.e., reproduces) the function &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039;, provided, of course that &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; is holomorphic!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|F_a\|^2 = \langle F_a\mid F_a\rangle = F_a(a) = \exp(|a|^2). &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It follows from the [[Cauchy–Schwarz inequality]] that elements of the Segal–Bargmann space satisfy the pointwise bounds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |F(a)| \leq \|F_a\| \|F\| = \exp(|a|^2/2)\|F\|. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quantum mechanical interpretation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One may interpret a unit vector in the Segal–Bargmann space as the wave function for a quantum particle moving in &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. In this view, &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; plays the role of the classical phase space, whereas &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; is the configuration space. The restriction that &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; be holomorphic is essential to this interpretation; if &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; were an arbitrary square-integrable function, it could be localized into an arbitrarily small region of the phase space, which would go against the uncertainty principle. Since, however, &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; is required to be holomorphic, it satisfies the pointwise bounds described above, which provides a limit on how concentrated &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; can be in any region of phase space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a unit vector &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; in the Segal–Bargmann space, the quantity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\pi^{-n}|F(z)|^2 \exp(-|z|^2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
may be interpreted as a sort of phase space probability density for the particle. Since the above quantity is manifestly non-negative, it cannot coincide with the [[Wigner function]] of the particle, which usually has some negative values. In fact, the above density coincides with the [[Husimi Q representation|Husimi function]] of the particle, which is obtained from the Wigner function by smearing with a Gaussian. This connection will be made more precise below, after we introduce the Segal–Bargmann transform.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The canonical commutation relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One may introduce &#039;&#039;&#039;annihilation operators&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and &#039;&#039;&#039;creation operators&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  on the Segal–Bargann space by setting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_j = \partial /\partial z_j &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; a_j^* = z_j &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These operators satisfy the same relations as the usual creation and annihilation operators, namely, the &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;s and &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;s commute among themselves and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; [a_j,a_k^*] = \delta_{j,k} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, the adjoint of &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; with respect to the inner product in (x) is &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. (This is suggested by the notation, but not at all obvious from the formulas for &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and &#039;&#039;a&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!) Indeed, Bargmann was led to introduce the particular form of the inner product on the Segal–Bargmann space precisely so that the creation and annihilation operators would be adjoints of each other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may now construct self-adjoint &amp;quot;position&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;momentum&amp;quot; operators &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; by the formulas:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; A_j = (a_j+a_j^*)/2 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; B_j = (a_j - a_j^*)/(2i) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These operators satisfy the ordinary canonical commutation relations. It can be shown that &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; satisfy the exponentiated commutation relations (i.e., the [[Stone–von Neumann theorem|Weyl relations]]) and that they act irreducibly on the Segal–Bargmann space; see Section 14.4 of {{harvtxt|Hall|2013}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Segal–Bargmann transform ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the operators &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;j&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; from the previous section satisfy the Weyl relations and act irreducibly on the Segal–Bargmann space, the [[Stone–von Neumann theorem]] applies. Thus, there is a unitary map &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039; from the position Hilbert space &#039;&#039;L&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) to the Segal–Bargmann space that intertwines these operators with the usual position and momentum operators. The map &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039; may be computed explicitly as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (Bf)(z) = \int_{R^n} \exp[-(z \cdot z - 2 \sqrt{2} z \cdot x + x \cdot x)/2]f(x) \, dx,  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where d&#039;&#039;x&#039;&#039; is the &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;-dimensional Lebesgue measure on &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and where z is in &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. See Bargmann (1961) and Section 14.4 of Hall (2013). One can also describe (&#039;&#039;Bf&#039;&#039;)(&#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;) as the inner product of &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; with an appropriately normalized [[coherent state]] with parameter &#039;&#039;z&#039;&#039;, where now we express the coherent states in the position representation instead of in the Segal–Bargmann space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We may now be more precise about the connection between the Segal–Bargmann space and the Husimi function of a particle. If &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; is a unit vector in L^2(R^n), then we may form a probability density on C^n as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \pi^{-n} |(Bf)(z)|^2 \exp(-|z|^2),\, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim is then that the above density is the [[Husimi Q representation|Husimi function]] of &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039;, which may be obtained from the [[Wigner function]] of &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; by convolving with a Gaussian. This fact is easily verified by using the formula for &#039;&#039;Bf&#039;&#039; along with the standard formula for the [[Husimi Q representation|Husimi function]] in terms of coherent states. See also Section 8 of Hall (2000).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039; is unitary, its Hermitian adjoint is its inverse. We thus obtain one inversion formula for &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039; as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f(x) = \int_{C^n} \exp[-(\overline{z} \cdot \overline{z} - 2 \sqrt{2} \overline{z} \cdot x + x \cdot x)/2](Bf)(z) \, dz,  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since, however, &#039;&#039;Bf&#039;&#039; is a holomorphic function, there can be many integrals involving &#039;&#039;Bf&#039;&#039; that give the same value. (Think of the Cauchy integral formula.) Thus, there can be many different inversion formulas for the Segal–Bargmann transform &#039;&#039;B&#039;&#039;. Another useful inversion formula is&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;B.C. Hall, &amp;quot;The range of the heat operator&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;The Ubiquitous Heat Kernel&#039;&#039;, edited by Jay Jorgensen and Lynne Walling, AMS 2006, pp. 203–231&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f(x) = C \exp(-|x|^2/2) \int_{R^n} (Bf)(x+iy)\exp(-|y|^2/2) \, dy,  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; C = \pi^{-n/4} (2\pi)^{-n/2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. This inversion formula may be understood as saying that the position &#039;&#039;wave function&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;f&#039;&#039; may be obtained from the phase space &#039;&#039;wave function&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Bf&#039;&#039; by integrating out the momentum variables. This should be contrasted to the situation with the Wigner function, where the position &#039;&#039;probability density&#039;&#039; is obtained from the phase space (pseudo-) &#039;&#039;probability density&#039;&#039; by integrating out the momentum variables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Generalizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are various generalizations of the Segal–Bargmann transform. In one of these,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;B.C. Hall, &amp;quot;The Segal–Bargmann &#039;coherent state&#039; transform for compact Lie groups&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;J. Functional Analysis&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;122&#039;&#039;&#039; (1994), 103–151&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;B.C. Hall, &amp;quot;The inverse Segal–Bargmann transform for compact Lie groups&amp;quot;, &#039;&#039;J. Functional Analysis&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;143&#039;&#039;&#039; (1997), 98–116&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the role of the configuration space &#039;&#039;R&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; is played by the group manifold of a compact Lie group, such as SU(&#039;&#039;N&#039;&#039;). The role of the phase space &#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; is then played by the &#039;&#039;complexification&#039;&#039; of the compact Lie group, such as SL(&#039;&#039;N&#039;&#039;;&#039;&#039;C&#039;&#039;) in the case of SU(&#039;&#039;N&#039;&#039;). The various Gaussians appearing in the ordinary Segal–Bargmann space and transform are replaced by [[heat kernel]]s. See Olafsson (2014) for more information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theta representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hardy space]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Refbegin}}&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Citation | first = V. | last = Bargmann | title = On a Hilbert space of analytic functions and an associated integral transform | journal= Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics | volume = 14 | year=1961 | page = 187 | doi = 10.1002/cpa.3160140303 | issue = 3 }}&lt;br /&gt;
* {{citation|first = I. E. | last = Segal | year = 1963 | contribution = Mathematical problems of relativistic physics | at = Chap. VI | title = Proceedings of the Summer Seminar, Boulder, Colorado, 1960, Vol. II | editor-first = M. | editor-last = Kac | series = Lectures in Applied Mathematics | publisher = American Mathematical Society }}&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Citation | first = G. | last = Folland | title = Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space | publisher=Princeton University Press | year=1989 }}&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Citation | first1 = J. | last1 = Baez | first2 = I. E. | last2 = Segal | author3 = | first3 = Z. | last3 =  Zhou | title = Introduction to Algebraic and Constructive Quantum Field Theory | publisher=Princeton University Press | year=1992 }}&lt;br /&gt;
* Hall, B. C. (2000), &amp;quot;Holomorphic methods in analysis and mathematical physics&amp;quot;, in &#039;&#039;First Summer School in Analysis and Mathematical Physics&#039;&#039; (S. Pérez-Esteva and C. Villegas-Blas, Eds.), 1–59, Contemporary Mathematics &#039;&#039;&#039;260&#039;&#039;&#039;, Amer. Math. Soc.&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Citation | first = B. C. | last = Hall | title = Quantum Theory for Mathematicians | publisher=Springer | year=2013 }}&lt;br /&gt;
* {{Citation | first = G. | last = Olafsson | title = The Segal–Bargmann Transform on Euclidean Space and Generalizations | publisher=World Scientific | year=2014 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Refend}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Segal-Bargmann space}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mathematics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>74.111.185.131</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>