Compact closed category - Revision history

en>Wikidsp: /* Properties */

2014-05-30T14:20:11Z

Properties

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 30 May 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'~~''Post's inversion formula'''~~ for ~~[[Laplace transform]]s, named after [[Emil Leon Post\|Emil Post]], is~~ a ~~simple-looking~~ but usually ~~impractical formula for evaluating an [[inverse Laplace transform]]~~.		Hi there, I am Andrew Berryhill. Kentucky is exactly where I've always been living. Invoicing is what I do for a living but I've usually wanted my own company. To perform lacross is the thing I adore most of all.<br><br>My web blog ... [http://netwk.hannam.ac.kr/xe/data_2/85669 tarot card readings]

	~~The statement of the formula~~ is ~~as follows: Let ''f''(''t'') be a continuous function on~~ the ~~interval [0, ∞)~~ of ~~exponential order, i.e.~~

	~~: <math>\sup_{t>0} \frac{f(t)}{e^{bt}} < \infty</math>~~

	~~for some real number ''b''. Then for~~ all ~~''s'' > ''b'', the Laplace transform for ''f''(''t'') exists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to ''s''~~. ~~Furthermore, if ''F''(''s'') is the Laplace transform of ''f''(''t''), then the inverse Laplace transform of ''F''(''s'') is given by~~

	~~: <math>f(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F(s)\}~~
	~~= \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{k!} \left( \frac{k}{t} \right) ^{k+1} F^{(k)} \left( \frac{k}{t} \right)</math>~~

	~~for ''t'' > 0, where ''F''~~<~~sup~~>~~(''k'')~~<~~/sup~~> ~~is the ''k''-th derivative of ''F'' with respect to ''s''~~.

	~~As can be seen from the formula, the need to evaluate derivatives of arbitrarily high orders renders this formula impractical for most purposes~~.

	With the advent of powerful home computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using the [[Grunwald-Letnikov differintegral]] to evaluate the derivatives.

	Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where the [[Pole (complex analysis)\|poles]] of ''F''(''s'') lie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for big ''x'' using inverse [[Mellin transform]]s for several arithmetical functions related to the [[Riemann Hypothesis]].

	~~== See also ==~~
	* [[Poisson summation formula]]
	~~== References ==~~
	* {{Citation \| last1=Widder \| first1=D. V. \| title=The Laplace Transform \| publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] \| year=1946}}
	* [http://~~www~~.~~rose-hulman~~.~~edu~~/~~~bryan~~/~~invlap.pdf Elementary inversion of the Laplace transform]. Bryan, Kurt. Accessed June 14, 2006.~~



	~~[[Category:Integral transforms]~~]

en>Wikidsp at 16:58, 29 January 2014

2014-01-29T16:58:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 29 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The ~~name~~ of the ~~author~~ is ~~Luther~~. ~~He presently life in Idaho and his mothers and fathers live nearby~~. ~~What she enjoys doing is bottle tops collecting~~ and ~~she~~ is ~~trying~~ to ~~make it a occupation~~. ~~His day occupation~~ is ~~a monetary officer but he ideas on altering it.~~<br><br>~~Take a look at my web site extended car warranty~~ ([http://~~Www~~.~~Medixclinic~~.ie/~~UserProfile~~/~~tabid/57/userId/2720/Default~~.~~aspx related resource site~~])		'''Post's inversion formula''' for [[Laplace transform]]s, named after [[Emil Leon Post\|Emil Post]], is a simple-looking but usually impractical formula for evaluating an [[inverse Laplace transform]].

			The statement of the formula is as follows: Let ''f''(''t'') be a continuous function on the interval [0, ∞) of exponential order, i.e.

			: <math>\sup_{t>0} \frac{f(t)}{e^{bt}} < \infty</math>

			for some real number ''b''. Then for all ''s'' > ''b'', the Laplace transform for ''f''(''t'') exists and is infinitely differentiable with respect to ''s''. Furthermore, if ''F''(''s'') is the Laplace transform of ''f''(''t''), then the inverse Laplace transform of ''F''(''s'') is given by

			: <math>f(t) = \mathcal{L}^{-1} \{F(s)\}
			= \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{(-1)^k}{k!} \left( \frac{k}{t} \right) ^{k+1} F^{(k)} \left( \frac{k}{t} \right)</math>

			for ''t'' > 0, where ''F''<sup>(''k'')</sup> is the ''k''-th derivative of ''F'' with respect to ''s''.

			As can be seen from the formula, the need to evaluate derivatives of arbitrarily high orders renders this formula impractical for most purposes.

			With the advent of powerful home computers, the main efforts to use this formula have come from dealing with approximations or asymptotic analysis of the Inverse Laplace transform, using the [[Grunwald-Letnikov differintegral]] to evaluate the derivatives.

			Post's inversion has attracted interest due to the improvement in computational science and the fact that it is not necessary to know where the [[Pole (complex analysis)\|poles]] of ''F''(''s'') lie, which make it possible to calculate the asymptotic behaviour for big ''x'' using inverse [[Mellin transform]]s for several arithmetical functions related to the [[Riemann Hypothesis]].

			== See also ==
			* [[Poisson summation formula]]
			== References ==
			* {{Citation \| last1=Widder \| first1=D. V. \| title=The Laplace Transform \| publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] \| year=1946}}
			* [http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~bryan/invlap.pdf Elementary inversion of the Laplace transform]. Bryan, Kurt. Accessed June 14, 2006.



			[[Category:Integral transforms]]

en>Linas: /* References */ copy text from rigid category per talk page

2012-08-25T02:21:11Z

References: copy text from rigid category per talk page

New page

The name of the author is Luther. He presently life in Idaho and his mothers and fathers live nearby. What she enjoys doing is bottle tops collecting and she is trying to make it a occupation. His day occupation is a monetary officer but he ideas on altering it.<br><br>Take a look at my web site extended car warranty ([http://Www.Medixclinic.ie/UserProfile/tabid/57/userId/2720/Default.aspx related resource site])