<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=M%2FG%2Fk_queue</id>
	<title>M/G/k queue - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=M%2FG%2Fk_queue"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=M/G/k_queue&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-05T22:55:42Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0-wmf.28</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=M/G/k_queue&amp;diff=27293&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>en&gt;BG19bot: WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #61.  Punctuation goes before References. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (9890)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/index.php?title=M/G/k_queue&amp;diff=27293&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2014-01-30T07:21:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/index.php?title=WP:CHECKWIKI&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;WP:CHECKWIKI (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;WP:CHECKWIKI&lt;/a&gt; error fix for #61.  Punctuation goes before References. Do &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GENFIXES&quot; class=&quot;extiw&quot; title=&quot;wikipedia:GENFIXES&quot;&gt;general fixes&lt;/a&gt; if a problem exists. - using &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php?title=Testwiki:AWB&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Testwiki:AWB (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;AWB&lt;/a&gt; (9890)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In [[mathematics]], &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Nevanlinna&amp;#039;s criterion&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in [[complex analysis]], proved in 1920 by the Finnish mathematician [[Rolf Nevanlinna]], characterizes [[holomorphic]] [[univalent functions]] on the [[unit disk]] which are [[star domain|starlike]]. Nevanlinna used this criterion to prove the [[Bieberbach conjecture]] for starlike univalent functions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statement of criterion==&lt;br /&gt;
A univalent function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on the unit disk satisfying &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0)&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;0 and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0)&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;1 is starlike, i.e. has image invariant under multilpication by real numbers in [0,1], if and only if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z h^\prime(z)/h(z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has positive real part for |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;&amp;amp;nbsp;1 and takes the value 1 at&amp;amp;nbsp;0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that, by applying the result to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;•&amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;rz&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), the criterion applies on any disc |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;| &amp;lt; r with only the requirement that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0) = 0 and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0) ≠ 0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proof of criterion==&lt;br /&gt;
Let &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) be a starlike univalent function on |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;| &amp;lt; 1 with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0) = 0 and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0) = 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt; 0, define&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{harvnb|Hayman|1994|p=14}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f_t(z)=h^{-1}(e^{-t}h(z)), \, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a semigroup of holomorphic mappinga of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;D&amp;#039;&amp;#039; into itself fixing 0.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the [[Koenigs function]] for the semigroup &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the [[Schwarz lemma]], |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)| decreases as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039; increases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\partial_t |f_t(z)|^2 \le 0.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, setting &amp;#039;&amp;#039;w&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;),&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \partial_t |f_t(z)|^2 =2\Re\, \overline{f_t(z)} \partial_t f_t(z) = 2 \Re\, \overline{w} v(w),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v(w)= -{h(w)\over h^\prime(w)}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Re\, \overline{w} {h(w)\over h^\prime (w)} \ge 0.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and so, dividing by |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;w&amp;#039;&amp;#039;|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Re\, {h(w)\over w h^\prime (w)} \ge 0.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taking reciprocals and letting &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039; go to 0 gives&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \Re\, z {h^\prime(z)\over h(z)} \ge  0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for all |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;| &amp;lt; 1.  Since the left hand side is a [[harmonic function]], the [[maximum principle]] implies the inequality is strict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conversely if&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g(z) =z {h^\prime(z)\over h(z)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
has positive real part and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0)&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;amp;nbsp;1, then &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; can vanish only at 0, where it must have a simple zero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\partial_\theta \arg h(re^{i\theta})=\partial_\theta \Im\, \log h(z) = \Im\, \partial_\theta \log h(z)=\Im\, {\partial z\over \partial\theta} \cdot \partial_z \log h(z) =\Re\, z {h^\prime(z)\over h(z)}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039; traces the circle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z=re^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the argument of the image &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h(re^{i\theta})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; increases strictly. By the [[argument principle]], since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has a simple zero at 0,&lt;br /&gt;
it circles the origin just once. The interior of the region bounded by the curve it traces is therefore starlike. If &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a point in the interior then the number of solutions &amp;#039;&amp;#039;N&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h(z)&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;| &amp;lt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is given by&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; N(a) ={1\over 2\pi i} \int_{|z|=r} {h^\prime(z) \over h(z)-a}\, dz.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since this is an integer, depends continuously on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;N&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(0) = 1, it is identically 1. So &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is univalent and starlike in each disk |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;| &amp;lt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and hence everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application to Bieberbach conjecture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carathéodory&amp;#039;s lemma===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Constantin Carathéodory]] proved in 1907 that if&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g(z)= 1 +b_1 z + b_2 z^2 + \cdots.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is a holomorphic function on the unit disk  &amp;#039;&amp;#039;D&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with  positive real part, then&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{harvnb|Duren|1982|p=41}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{harvnb|Pommerenke|1975|p=40}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |b_n|\le 2.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In fact it suffices to show the result with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &lt;br /&gt;
replaced by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(z) = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;rz&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) for any &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt; 1 and then pass to the limit &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = 1. &lt;br /&gt;
In that case &amp;#039;&amp;#039;g&amp;#039;&amp;#039; extends to a continuous function on the closed disc with positive real part and by [[Schwarz formula]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g(z) = {1\over 2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} { e^{i\theta}+  z\over e^{i\theta} -z} \Re g(e^{i\theta})\, d\theta.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the identity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;  { e^{i\theta}+  z\over e^{i\theta} -z} = 1 +2 \sum_{n\ge 1} e^{-in\theta} z^n,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it follows that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\int_0^{2\pi}  \Re g(e^{i\theta}) \,d\theta =1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so defines a probability measure, and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b_n =2\int_0^{2\pi} e^{-int} \Re g(e^{i\theta}) \,d\theta.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |b_n| \le 2 \int_0^{2\pi} \Re g(e^{i\theta}) \,d\theta =2. &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Proof for starlike functions===&lt;br /&gt;
Let&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; f(z) = z + a_2 z^2 + a_3 z^3 + \cdots &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
be a univalent starlike function in |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;| &amp;lt; 1. {{harvtxt|Nevanlinna|1921}} proved that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|a_n|\le n.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact by Nevanlinna&amp;#039;s criterion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g(z) = z{f^\prime(z)\over f(z)} = 1 + b_1 z + b_2 z^2 + \cdots&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
has positive real part for |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;z&amp;#039;&amp;#039;|&amp;lt;1. So by Carathéodory&amp;#039;s lemma&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |b_n|\le 2.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; z f^\prime(z) = g(z) f(z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
gives the recurrence relation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (n-1) a_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} b_{n-k}a_k.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = 1. Thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |a_n|\le {2\over n-1} \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} |a_k|,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so it follows by induction that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|a_n|\le n.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|first=C.|last=Carathéodory|title=Über den Variabilitatsbereich der Koeffizienten von Potenzreihen, die gegebene Werte nicht annehmen|journal= Math. Ann.|volume= 64|pages= 95–115|year=1907}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Duren|first=P. L.|title=&lt;br /&gt;
Univalent functions|series=Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften|volume= 259|publisher= Springer-Verlag|year= 1983|isbn= 0-387-90795-5|pages=41–42}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Hayman|first= W. K.|title=Multivalent functions|edition=2nd|series=Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics|volume=110|publisher= Cambridge University Press|year= 1994|isbn= 0-521-46026-3}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Nevanlinna|first= R.|title=Über die konforme Abbildung von Sterngebieten|journal=Ofvers. Finska Vet. Soc. Forh. |volume=53 |year=1921|pages=1–21}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{citation|last=Pommerenke|first= C.|authorlink=Christian Pommerenke|title=Univalent functions, with a chapter on quadratic differentials by Gerd Jensen|series= Studia Mathematica/Mathematische Lehrbücher|volume=15|publisher= Vandenhoeck &amp;amp; Ruprecht|year= 1975}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Analytic functions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>en&gt;BG19bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>