Additive increase/multiplicative decrease: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>RjwilmsiBot
m fixing page range dashes using AWB (7861)
 
renamed additive increase factor to parameter
Line 1: Line 1:
Myrtle Benny is how I'm called and I feel comfortable when people  [http://welkinn.com/profile-17521/info/ std home test] use the complete title. One of the very best issues in the world for him is to collect badges but he is having difficulties to discover time for it. I utilized to be unemployed but now I am a librarian and  home [http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/11/prweb11361237.htm std test] kit the salary  std home test has been really fulfilling. Puerto Rico is exactly where he's always been living but she needs to transfer simply because  home std test kit of her family  [http://essexsinglesnights.co.uk/groups/cures-for-any-candida-tips-to-use-now/ at home std testing] members.<br><br>Visit my page: [http://www.webmdbook.com/index.php?do=/profile-11685/info/ over the counter std test]
In economics, an agent's preferences are said to be '''weakly monotonic''' if, given a consumption bundle <math>x</math>, the agent prefers all consumption bundles <math>y</math>  that have more of every good. That is, <math>y \gg x</math> implies <math>y\succ x</math>. An agent's preferences are said to be '''strongly monotonic''' if, given a consumption bundle <math>x</math>, the agent prefers all consumption bundles <math>y</math> that have more of at least one good, and not less in any other good. That is, <math>y\geq x</math> and <math>y\neq x</math> imply <math>y\succ x</math>.
 
This definition defines monotonic increasing preferences. Monotonic decreasing preferences can often be defined to be compatible with this definition. For instance, an agent's preferences for pollution may be monotonic decreasing (less pollution is better). In this case, the agent's preferences for lack of pollution are monotonic increasing.
 
Much of consumer theory relies on a weaker assumption, [[local nonsatiation]].
 
An example of preferences which are weakly monotonic but not strongly monotonic are those represented by a [[Leontief Utilities|Leontief utility function]].
 
==References==
* [[Andreu Mas-Colell|Mas-Colell, Andreu]], Whinston, Michael D., Green, Jerry R. ''Microeconomic Theory.'' Oxford University Press. 1995.
 
==See also==
*[[Monotonic function#Monotonicity in calculus and analysis]]
*[[Strict]]
 
[[Category:Microeconomics]]
[[Category:Consumer theory]]
 
{{microeconomics-stub}}

Revision as of 08:29, 7 July 2013

In economics, an agent's preferences are said to be weakly monotonic if, given a consumption bundle x, the agent prefers all consumption bundles y that have more of every good. That is, yx implies yx. An agent's preferences are said to be strongly monotonic if, given a consumption bundle x, the agent prefers all consumption bundles y that have more of at least one good, and not less in any other good. That is, yx and yx imply yx.

This definition defines monotonic increasing preferences. Monotonic decreasing preferences can often be defined to be compatible with this definition. For instance, an agent's preferences for pollution may be monotonic decreasing (less pollution is better). In this case, the agent's preferences for lack of pollution are monotonic increasing.

Much of consumer theory relies on a weaker assumption, local nonsatiation.

An example of preferences which are weakly monotonic but not strongly monotonic are those represented by a Leontief utility function.

References

  • Mas-Colell, Andreu, Whinston, Michael D., Green, Jerry R. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press. 1995.

See also

Template:Microeconomics-stub