Clamper (electronics): Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Spinningspark
→‎Op-amp circuit: Linearity is also improved
reverting vandalism
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Betti's theorem''',  also known as '''Maxwell-Betti reciprocal work theorem''', discovered by [[Enrico Betti]] in 1872, states that for a linear elastic structure subject to two sets of forces {P<sub>i</sub>} i=1,...,m and {Q<sub>j</sub>}, j=1,2,...,n, the [[Mechanical work|work]] done by the set P through the displacements produced by the set Q is equal to the work done by the set Q through the displacements produced by the set P. This theorem has applications in [[structural engineering]] where it is used to define [[influence line]]s and derive the [[boundary element method]].
The individual who wrote the article is known as Jayson Hirano and he totally digs that name. What me and my family love is performing ballet but I've been using on new issues recently. For years he's been residing in Alaska and he doesn't plan on altering it. My day job is an invoicing officer but I've currently utilized for an additional 1.<br><br>Here is my blog [http://netwk.hannam.ac.kr/xe/data_2/85669 free psychic]
 
Betti's theorem is used in the design of compliant mechanisms by topology optimization approach.
 
==Demonstration==
Consider a solid body subjected to a pair of external force systems, referred to as <math>F^P_i</math> and <math>F^Q_i</math>.  Consider that each force system causes a displacement fields, with the displacements measured at the external force's point of application referred to as <math>d^P_i</math> and <math>d^Q_i</math>.
 
When the <math>F^P_i</math> force system is applied to the structure, the balance between the work performed by the external force system and the strain energy is:
 
:<math>
\frac{1}{2}\sum^n_{i=1}F^P_id^P_i = \frac{1}{2}\int_\Omega \sigma^P_{ij}\epsilon^P_{ij}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
The work-energy balance associated with the <math>F^Q_i</math> force system is as follows:
 
:<math>
\frac{1}{2}\sum^n_{i=1}F^Q_id^Q_i = \frac{1}{2}\int_\Omega \sigma^Q_{ij}\epsilon^Q_{ij}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
Now, consider that with the <math>F^P_i</math> force system applied, the <math>F^Q_i</math> force system is applied subsequently. As the <math>F^P_i</math> is already applied and therefore won't cause any extra displacement, the work-energy balance assumes the following expression:
 
:<math>
\frac{1}{2}\sum^n_{i=1}F^Q_id^Q_i + \sum^n_{i=1}F^P_id^Q_i = \frac{1}{2}\int_\Omega \sigma^Q_{ij}\epsilon^Q_{ij}\,d\Omega + \int_\Omega \sigma^P_{ij}\epsilon^Q_{ij}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
Conversely, if we consider the <math>F^Q_i</math> force system already applied and the <math>F^P_i</math> external force system applied subsequently, the work-energy balance will assume the following expression:
 
:<math>
\frac{1}{2}\sum^n_{i=1}F^P_id^P_i + \sum^n_{i=1}F^Q_id^P_i = \frac{1}{2}\int_\Omega \sigma^P_{ij}\epsilon^P_{ij}\,d\Omega + \int_\Omega \sigma^Q_{ij}\epsilon^P_{ij}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
If the work-energy balance for the cases where the external force systems are applied in isolation are respectively subtracted from the cases where the force systems are applied simultaneously, we arrive at the following equations:
 
:<math>
\sum^n_{i=1}F^P_id^Q_i = \int_\Omega \sigma^P_{ij}\epsilon^Q_{ij}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
:<math>
\sum^n_{i=1}F^Q_id^P_i = \int_\Omega \sigma^Q_{ij}\epsilon^P_{ij}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
If the solid body where the force systems are applied is formed by a [[Linear elasticity|linear elastic material]] and if the force systems are such that only [[Infinitesimal strain theory|infinitesimal strains]] are observed in the body, then the body's [[constitutive equation]], which may follow [[Hooke's law]], can be expressed in the following manner:
 
:<math>
\sigma_{ij}=D_{ijkl}\epsilon_{kl}
</math>
 
Replacing this result in the previous set of equations leads us to the following result:
 
:<math>
\sum^n_{i=1}F^P_id^Q_i = \int_\Omega D_{ijkl}\epsilon^P_{ij}\epsilon^Q_{kl}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
:<math>
\sum^n_{i=1}F^Q_id^P_i = \int_\Omega D_{ijkl}\epsilon^Q_{ij}\epsilon^P_{kl}\,d\Omega
</math>
 
If we subtracting both equations then we obtain the following result:
 
:<math>
\sum^n_{i=1}F^P_id^Q_i = \sum^n_{i=1}F^Q_id^P_i
</math>
 
==Example==
For a simple example let m=1 and n=1. Consider a horizontal [[Beam (structure)|beam]] on which two points have been defined: point 1 and point 2. First we apply a vertical force P at point 1 and measure the vertical displacement of point 2, denoted <math>\Delta_{P2}</math>.  Next we remove force P and apply a vertical force Q at point 2, which produces the vertical displacement at point 1 of <math>\Delta_{Q1}</math>.  Betti's reciprocity theorem states that:
 
:<math>P \,\Delta_{Q1}=Q \,\Delta_{P2}.</math>
 
==See also==
* [[D'Alembert's principle]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
*{{cite book |title=Structural analysis: a unified classical and matrix approach |author1=A Ghali |author2=A.M. Neville |year=1972 |publisher=E & FN SPON |location=London, New York |isbn=0-419-21200-0 |page=215 }}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Betti's Theorem}}
[[Category:Structural analysis]]
[[Category:Continuum mechanics]]
[[Category:Physics theorems]]

Revision as of 19:08, 10 February 2014

The individual who wrote the article is known as Jayson Hirano and he totally digs that name. What me and my family love is performing ballet but I've been using on new issues recently. For years he's been residing in Alaska and he doesn't plan on altering it. My day job is an invoicing officer but I've currently utilized for an additional 1.

Here is my blog free psychic