Poisson's equation: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Ronoth
m →‎Electrostatics: Modified grammar of opening sentence
 
en>Nick Levine
m Reverted edits by 79.150.2.175 (talk) to last version by David Eppstein
Line 1: Line 1:
There is a bit more than 1 method to calculate the body fat, yet to be able to receive anything even close to an exact measuring (without going to a doctor), we will need to have several flexible measuring tape plus a calculator. There are several techniques of calculating boy fat, and this 1 is based on the "U.S. Navy Circumference Method." As a warning, these are pretty complex plus it may be better merely to get a physical.<br><br>No matter what you eat, usually observe the portion sizes. There is too much of a wise thing! Watch out for cream based soups plus sauces; instead try tomato-based because a healthy alternative. Fried foods are a big no-no, have the fish plus meats baked or grilled! Instead of a baked dessert, have fresh fruit. As another superior guideline, employ cooking spray instead of oils.<br><br>Not consuming enough calories plus nutritients is a main wellness risk which could cause not merely disorder, nevertheless death even. A healthy diet could be balanced plus comprise of 1,500 to 2,000 calories a day depending on physical acitivity. Taking multivitamins daily could further guarantee which the body's needs for nutrients are met. Steer clear of fasts for fat loss or fad diets advocating the consumpion of just one kind of food for a certain period of time as these can furthermore cause malnutrition.<br><br>It is significant to note which fat is regarded as the most important factors connected to several diseases. Other important factors which ought to be taken into consideration while assessing the dangers of chronic diseases include physical activity, blood stress, blood glucose level, plus diet to name only a limited. BMI indicates the total body fat of an individual, that could be calculated through a [http://safedietplansforwomen.com/bmi-calculator bmi calculator women]. The calculator requires 2 pieces of information - weight inside kilograms or pounds plus height inside feet or centimeters.<br><br>How do we understand if you child is truly overweight or obese? We physician will enable we determine whether your child meets the criteria for medical obesity, though you may be capable to determine at house whether your child meets the criteria to be significantly overweight or fat..<br><br>When you know your BMI, simply compare it to the chart below. Please note that a high BMI does not mean you are at risk. Consult a doctor when you're not certain.<br><br>Yes, naturally. BMI will be utilized to get a rather general idea of someone's body composition. It must never be utilized to diagnose any condition. If you are a serious athlete or have wellness issues then it is very suggested that you used a more exact system of acquiring the body fat percentage.
{{more footnotes|date=December 2012}}
In [[mathematics]], specifically in [[homology theory]] and [[algebraic topology]], '''cohomology''' is a general term for a [[sequence]] of [[abelian group]]s defined from a [[chain complex|co-chain complex]].  That is, cohomology is defined as the abstract study of '''cochains''', [[chain complex|cocycle]]s, and [[coboundary|coboundaries]].  Cohomology can be viewed as a method of assigning [[algebraic invariant]]s to a topological space that has a more refined [[algebraic structure]] than does [[homology (mathematics)|homology]]. Cohomology arises from the algebraic dualization of the construction of homology. In less abstract language, cochains in the fundamental sense should assign 'quantities' to the ''[[chain (algebraic topology)|chains]]'' of homology theory.
 
From its beginning in [[topology]], this idea became a dominant method in the mathematics of the second half of the twentieth century; from the initial idea of ''homology'' as a topologically invariant relation on ''chains'', the range of applications of homology and cohomology theories has spread out over [[geometry]] and [[abstract algebra]]. The terminology tends to mask the fact that in many applications ''cohomology'', a [[Covariance and contravariance of vectors|contravariant]] theory, is more natural than ''homology''. At a basic level this has to do with [[function (mathematics)|function]]s and [[pullback (differential geometry)|pullback]]s in geometric situations: given spaces ''X'' and ''Y'', and some kind of function ''F'' on ''Y'', for any [[Map (mathematics)|mapping]] ''f'' : ''X'' → ''Y'' composition with ''f'' gives rise to a function ''F'' o ''f'' on ''X''. Cohomology groups often also have a natural product, the [[cup product]], which gives them a [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] structure. Because of this feature, cohomology is a stronger invariant than homology, as it can differentiate between certain algebraic objects that homology cannot.
 
==Definition==
In [[algebraic topology]], the cohomology groups for spaces can be defined as follows (see Hatcher). Given a topological space ''X'', consider the chain complex
 
: <math>\cdots \rightarrow C_n \stackrel{ \partial_n}{\rightarrow}\ C_{n-1} \rightarrow \cdots </math>
 
as in the definition of [[singular homology]] (or [[simplicial homology]]). Here, the ''C<sub>n</sub>'' are the free abelian groups generated by formal linear combinations of the singular ''n''-simplices in ''X'' and ∂<sub>''n''</sub> is the ''n''<sup>th</sup> boundary operator.
 
Now replace each ''C<sub>n</sub>'' by its [[dual space]] ''C*<sub>n−1</sub>'' = Hom(''C<sub>n</sub>, G''), and ∂<sub>''n''</sub> by its [[dual space#Transpose of a linear map|transpose]]
: <math>\delta^n: C_{n-1}^* \rightarrow C_{n}^*</math>
to obtain the cochain complex
: <math>\cdots \leftarrow C_{n}^*  \stackrel{ \delta^n}{\leftarrow}\ C_{n-1}^*  \leftarrow \cdots </math>
Then the '''n<sup>th</sup> cohomology group with coefficients in G''' is defined to be Ker(δ<sup>''n''+1</sup>)/Im(δ<sup>''n''</sup>) and denoted by ''H<sup>n</sup>''(''C''; ''G''). The elements of ''C*<sub>n</sub>'' are called '''singular ''n''-cochains with coefficients in ''G'' ''', and the δ<sup>''n''</sup> are referred to as the '''coboundary operators'''. Elements of Ker(δ<sup>''n''+1</sup>), Im(δ<sup>''n''</sup>) are called '''cocycles''' and '''coboundaries''', respectively.
 
Note that the above definition can be adapted for general chain complexes, and not just the complexes used in singular homology. The study of general cohomology groups was a major motivation for the development of [[homological algebra]], and has since found applications in a wide variety of settings (see [[Cohomology#Cohomology theories|below]]).
 
Given an element φ of ''C*<sub>n-1</sub>'', it follows from the properties of the transpose that <math>\delta^n(\varphi) = \varphi \circ \partial_n</math> as elements of ''C*<sub>n</sub>''. We can use this fact to relate the cohomology and homology groups as follows. Every element φ of Ker(δ<sup>''n''</sup>) has a kernel containing the image of ∂<sub>''n''</sub>. So we can restrict φ to Ker(∂<sub>''n''−1</sub>) and take the quotient by the image of ∂<sub>''n''</sub> to obtain an element ''h''(φ) in Hom(''H<sub>n-1</sub>, G''). If φ is also contained in the image of δ<sup>''n''−1</sup>, then ''h''(φ) is zero. So we can take the quotient by Ker(δ<sup>''n''</sup>), and to obtain a homomorphism
:<math>h: H^n (C; G) \rightarrow \text{Hom}(H_n(C),G).</math>
It can be shown that this map h is surjective, and that we have a short split exact sequence
:<math>0 \rightarrow \ker h \rightarrow H^n(C; G) \stackrel{h}{\rightarrow} \text{Hom}(H_n(C),G) \rightarrow 0.</math>
 
==History==
Although cohomology is fundamental to modern [[algebraic topology]], its importance was not seen for some 40 years after the development of homology.  The concept of ''dual cell structure'', which [[Henri Poincaré]] used in his proof of his [[Poincaré duality]] theorem, contained the germ of the idea of cohomology, but this was not seen until later. 
 
There were various precursors to cohomology.  In the mid-1920s, [[James Waddell Alexander II|J. W. Alexander]] and [[Solomon Lefschetz]] founded the [[intersection theory]] of cycles on [[manifold]]s.  On an ''n''-[[dimension]]al manifold ''M'',  a ''p''-cycle and a ''q''-cycle with nonempty intersection will, if in [[general position]], have intersection a (''p''&nbsp;+&nbsp;''q''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;''n'')-cycle. This enables us to define a multiplication of homology classes
 
:''H''<sub>''p''</sub>(''M'') &times; ''H''<sub>''q''</sub>(''M'') &rarr; ''H''<sub>''p''+''q''−''n''</sub>(''M'').
 
[[James Waddell Alexander II|Alexander]] had by 1930 defined a first cochain notion, based on a ''p''-cochain on a space ''X'' having relevance to the small neighborhoods of the [[diagonal]] in ''X''<sup>''p''+1</sup>.
 
In 1931, [[Georges de Rham]] related homology and exterior [[differential form]]s, proving [[De Rham's theorem]]. This result is now understood to be more naturally interpreted in terms of cohomology.
 
In 1934, [[Lev Pontryagin]] proved the [[Pontryagin duality]] theorem; a result on [[topological group]]s. This (in rather special cases) provided an interpretation of [[Poincaré duality]] and [[Alexander duality]] in terms of [[group (mathematics)|group]] [[character (mathematics)|character]]s.
 
At a 1935 conference in [[Moscow]], [[Andrey Kolmogorov]] and [[James Waddell Alexander II|Alexander]] both introduced cohomology and tried to construct a cohomology product structure.
 
In 1936 [[Norman Steenrod]] published a paper constructing [[Čech cohomology]] by dualizing [[Čech homology]].
 
From 1936 to 1938, [[Hassler Whitney]] and [[Eduard Čech]] developed the [[cup product]] (making cohomology into a graded ring) and [[cap product]], and realized that Poincaré duality can be stated in terms of the cap product.  Their theory was still limited to [[wiktionary:finite|finite]] cell complexes.
 
In 1944, [[Samuel Eilenberg]] overcame the technical limitations, and gave the modern definition of [[singular homology]] and cohomology.
 
In 1945, Eilenberg and Steenrod stated the [[Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms|axioms]] defining a homology or cohomology theory.  In their 1952 book, ''[[Foundations of Algebraic Topology]]'', they proved that the existing homology and cohomology theories did indeed satisfy their axioms.<ref>Spanier, E. H. (2000) "Book reviews: Foundations of Algebraic Topology"  ''Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society'' 37(1): pp. 114–115</ref>
 
In 1948 [[Edwin Spanier]], building on work of Alexander and Kolmogorov, developed  [[Alexander–Spanier cohomology]].
 
== Cohomology theories ==
 
===Eilenberg–Steenrod theories===
A ''cohomology theory'' is a family of contravariant [[functor]]s from the [[category (mathematics)|category]] of pairs of [[topological space]]s and [[continuous function]]s (or some [[subcategory]] thereof such as the category of [[CW complex]]es) to the category of [[Abelian group]]s and group [[homomorphism]]s that satisfies the [[Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms]].
 
Some cohomology theories in this sense are:
*[[simplicial homology|simplicial cohomology]]
*[[singular cohomology]]
*[[de Rham cohomology]]
*[[Čech cohomology]]
 
{{anchor|Generalized cohomology theories}}
 
===Axioms and generalized cohomology theories===
{{See also|List of cohomology theories}}
There are various ways to define cohomology groups (for example [[singular cohomology]], [[Čech cohomology]], [[Alexander–Spanier cohomology]] or [[Sheaf cohomology]]).  These give different answers for some exotic spaces, but there is a large class of spaces on which they all agree. This is most easily understood axiomatically: there is a list of properties known as the [[Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms]], and any two constructions that share those properties will agree at least on all finite [[CW complex]]es, for example.
 
One of the axioms is the so-called dimension axiom: if ''P'' is a single point, then ''H<sub>n</sub>''(''P'') = 0 for all ''n'' ≠ 0, and ''H''<sub>0</sub>(''P'') = '''Z'''. We can generalise slightly by allowing an arbitrary abelian group ''A'' in dimension zero, but still insisting that the groups in nonzero dimension are trivial. It turns out that there is again an essentially unique system of groups satisfying these axioms, which are denoted by <math>H_*(X;A)</math>. In the common case where each group ''H<sub>k</sub>''(''X'') is isomorphic to '''Z'''<sup>''r<sub>k</sub>''</sup> for some ''r<sub>k</sub>'' in '''N''', we just have <math>H_k(X;A)=A^{r_k}</math>.  In general, the relationship between ''H<sub>k</sub>''(''X'') and <math>H_k(X;A)</math> is only a little more complicated, and is again controlled by the [[Universal coefficient theorem]].
 
More significantly, we can drop the dimension axiom altogether.  There are a number of different ways to define groups satisfying all the other axioms, including the following:
* The [[stable homotopy theory|stable homotopy groups]] <math>\pi^S_k(X)</math>
* Various different flavours of [[cobordism]] groups: <math>MO_*(X), MSO_*(X), MU_*(X)</math> and so on. The last of these (known as [[complex cobordism]]) is especially important, because of the link with [[Formal group|formal group theory]] via a theorem of [[Daniel Quillen]].
* Various different flavours of [[K-theory]]: <math>KO_*(X)</math> (real periodic K-theory), <math>kO_*(X)</math> (real connective), <math>KU_*(X)</math> (complex periodic), <math>kU_*(X)</math> (complex connective) and so on.
* [[Brown–Peterson cohomology|Brown–Peterson homology]], [[Morava K-theory]], Morava E-theory, and other theories defined using the algebra of formal groups.
* Various flavours of [[elliptic cohomology|elliptic homology]]
These are called generalised homology theories; they carry much richer information than ordinary homology, but are often harder to compute.  Their study is tightly linked (via the [[Brown representability theorem]]) to [[stable homotopy]].
 
A cohomology theory ''E'' is said to be '''multiplicative''' if <math>E^*(X)</math> is a [[graded ring]].
 
===Other cohomology theories===
Theories in a broader sense of ''cohomology'' include:<ref>http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.geocities.com/jefferywinkler2/ktheory3.html&date=2009-10-26+00:45:56</ref>
{{div col}}
*[[André–Quillen cohomology]]
*[[BRST cohomology]]
*[[Bonar–Claven cohomology]]
*[[Bounded cohomology]]
*[[Coherent cohomology]]
*[[Crystalline cohomology]]
*[[Cyclic cohomology]]
*[[Deligne cohomology]]
*[[Dirac cohomology]]
*[[Étale cohomology]]
*[[Flat cohomology]]
*[[Galois cohomology]]
*[[Gel'fand–Fuks cohomology]]
*[[Group cohomology]]
*[[Harrison cohomology]]
*[[Hochschild cohomology]]
*[[Intersection cohomology]]
*[[Khovanov Homology]]
*[[Lie algebra cohomology]]
*[[Local cohomology]]
*[[Motivic cohomology]]
*[[Non-abelian cohomology]]
*[[Perverse cohomology]]
*[[Quantum cohomology]]
*[[Schur cohomology]]
*[[Spencer cohomology]]
*[[Topological André–Quillen cohomology]]
*[[Topological cyclic cohomology]]
*[[Topological Hochschild cohomology]]
*[[Γ cohomology]]
{{div col end}}
 
==See also==
*[[List of cohomology theories]]
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
 
==References==
*[[Allen Hatcher|Hatcher, A.]] (2001) "[http://www.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATpage.html Algebraic Topology]", ''Cambridge U press'', England: Cambridge, p.&nbsp;198, ISBN 0-521-79160-X and ISBN 0-521-79540-0.
*Hazewinkel, M. (ed.) (1988) ''Encyclopaedia of Mathematics: An Updated and Annotated Translation of the Soviet "Mathematical Encyclopaedia"'' Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, p.&nbsp;68, ISBN 1-55608-010-7 (or direct link {{springer|title=Cohomology|id=p/c023060}}).
*E. Cline, B. Parshall, L. Scott and W. van der Kallen, (1977) "Rational and generic cohomology" ''Inventiones Mathematicae'' 39(2): pp.&nbsp;143–163.
*Asadollahi, Javad and Salarian, Shokrollah (2007) "Cohomology theories for complexes"  ''Journal of Pure & Applied Algebra'' 210(3): pp.&nbsp;771–787.
 
[[Category:Algebraic topology]]
[[Category:Cohomology theories|*]]
[[Category:Homological algebra]]
[[Category:Homology theory]]
 
[[ru:Гомология (топология)#Когомологии]]

Revision as of 19:35, 3 February 2014

Template:More footnotes In mathematics, specifically in homology theory and algebraic topology, cohomology is a general term for a sequence of abelian groups defined from a co-chain complex. That is, cohomology is defined as the abstract study of cochains, cocycles, and coboundaries. Cohomology can be viewed as a method of assigning algebraic invariants to a topological space that has a more refined algebraic structure than does homology. Cohomology arises from the algebraic dualization of the construction of homology. In less abstract language, cochains in the fundamental sense should assign 'quantities' to the chains of homology theory.

From its beginning in topology, this idea became a dominant method in the mathematics of the second half of the twentieth century; from the initial idea of homology as a topologically invariant relation on chains, the range of applications of homology and cohomology theories has spread out over geometry and abstract algebra. The terminology tends to mask the fact that in many applications cohomology, a contravariant theory, is more natural than homology. At a basic level this has to do with functions and pullbacks in geometric situations: given spaces X and Y, and some kind of function F on Y, for any mapping f : XY composition with f gives rise to a function F o f on X. Cohomology groups often also have a natural product, the cup product, which gives them a ring structure. Because of this feature, cohomology is a stronger invariant than homology, as it can differentiate between certain algebraic objects that homology cannot.

Definition

In algebraic topology, the cohomology groups for spaces can be defined as follows (see Hatcher). Given a topological space X, consider the chain complex

as in the definition of singular homology (or simplicial homology). Here, the Cn are the free abelian groups generated by formal linear combinations of the singular n-simplices in X and ∂n is the nth boundary operator.

Now replace each Cn by its dual space C*n−1 = Hom(Cn, G), and ∂n by its transpose

to obtain the cochain complex

Then the nth cohomology group with coefficients in G is defined to be Ker(δn+1)/Im(δn) and denoted by Hn(C; G). The elements of C*n are called singular n-cochains with coefficients in G , and the δn are referred to as the coboundary operators. Elements of Ker(δn+1), Im(δn) are called cocycles and coboundaries, respectively.

Note that the above definition can be adapted for general chain complexes, and not just the complexes used in singular homology. The study of general cohomology groups was a major motivation for the development of homological algebra, and has since found applications in a wide variety of settings (see below).

Given an element φ of C*n-1, it follows from the properties of the transpose that as elements of C*n. We can use this fact to relate the cohomology and homology groups as follows. Every element φ of Ker(δn) has a kernel containing the image of ∂n. So we can restrict φ to Ker(∂n−1) and take the quotient by the image of ∂n to obtain an element h(φ) in Hom(Hn-1, G). If φ is also contained in the image of δn−1, then h(φ) is zero. So we can take the quotient by Ker(δn), and to obtain a homomorphism

It can be shown that this map h is surjective, and that we have a short split exact sequence

History

Although cohomology is fundamental to modern algebraic topology, its importance was not seen for some 40 years after the development of homology. The concept of dual cell structure, which Henri Poincaré used in his proof of his Poincaré duality theorem, contained the germ of the idea of cohomology, but this was not seen until later.

There were various precursors to cohomology. In the mid-1920s, J. W. Alexander and Solomon Lefschetz founded the intersection theory of cycles on manifolds. On an n-dimensional manifold M, a p-cycle and a q-cycle with nonempty intersection will, if in general position, have intersection a (p + q − n)-cycle. This enables us to define a multiplication of homology classes

Hp(M) × Hq(M) → Hp+qn(M).

Alexander had by 1930 defined a first cochain notion, based on a p-cochain on a space X having relevance to the small neighborhoods of the diagonal in Xp+1.

In 1931, Georges de Rham related homology and exterior differential forms, proving De Rham's theorem. This result is now understood to be more naturally interpreted in terms of cohomology.

In 1934, Lev Pontryagin proved the Pontryagin duality theorem; a result on topological groups. This (in rather special cases) provided an interpretation of Poincaré duality and Alexander duality in terms of group characters.

At a 1935 conference in Moscow, Andrey Kolmogorov and Alexander both introduced cohomology and tried to construct a cohomology product structure.

In 1936 Norman Steenrod published a paper constructing Čech cohomology by dualizing Čech homology.

From 1936 to 1938, Hassler Whitney and Eduard Čech developed the cup product (making cohomology into a graded ring) and cap product, and realized that Poincaré duality can be stated in terms of the cap product. Their theory was still limited to finite cell complexes.

In 1944, Samuel Eilenberg overcame the technical limitations, and gave the modern definition of singular homology and cohomology.

In 1945, Eilenberg and Steenrod stated the axioms defining a homology or cohomology theory. In their 1952 book, Foundations of Algebraic Topology, they proved that the existing homology and cohomology theories did indeed satisfy their axioms.[1]

In 1948 Edwin Spanier, building on work of Alexander and Kolmogorov, developed Alexander–Spanier cohomology.

Cohomology theories

Eilenberg–Steenrod theories

A cohomology theory is a family of contravariant functors from the category of pairs of topological spaces and continuous functions (or some subcategory thereof such as the category of CW complexes) to the category of Abelian groups and group homomorphisms that satisfies the Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms.

Some cohomology theories in this sense are:

<Generalized cohomology theories>...</Generalized cohomology theories>

Axioms and generalized cohomology theories

DTZ's public sale group in Singapore auctions all forms of residential, workplace and retail properties, outlets, homes, lodges, boarding homes, industrial buildings and development websites. Auctions are at present held as soon as a month.

We will not only get you a property at a rock-backside price but also in an space that you've got longed for. You simply must chill out back after giving us the accountability. We will assure you 100% satisfaction. Since we now have been working in the Singapore actual property market for a very long time, we know the place you may get the best property at the right price. You will also be extremely benefited by choosing us, as we may even let you know about the precise time to invest in the Singapore actual property market.

The Hexacube is offering new ec launch singapore business property for sale Singapore investors want to contemplate. Residents of the realm will likely appreciate that they'll customize the business area that they wish to purchase as properly. This venture represents one of the crucial expansive buildings offered in Singapore up to now. Many investors will possible want to try how they will customise the property that they do determine to buy by means of here. This location has offered folks the prospect that they should understand extra about how this course of can work as well.

Singapore has been beckoning to traders ever since the value of properties in Singapore started sky rocketing just a few years again. Many businesses have their places of work in Singapore and prefer to own their own workplace area within the country once they decide to have a everlasting office. Rentals in Singapore in the corporate sector can make sense for some time until a business has discovered a agency footing. Finding Commercial Property Singapore takes a variety of time and effort but might be very rewarding in the long term.

is changing into a rising pattern among Singaporeans as the standard of living is increasing over time and more Singaporeans have abundance of capital to invest on properties. Investing in the personal properties in Singapore I would like to applaud you for arising with such a book which covers the secrets and techniques and tips of among the profitable Singapore property buyers. I believe many novice investors will profit quite a bit from studying and making use of some of the tips shared by the gurus." – Woo Chee Hoe Special bonus for consumers of Secrets of Singapore Property Gurus Actually, I can't consider one other resource on the market that teaches you all the points above about Singapore property at such a low value. Can you? Condominium For Sale (D09) – Yong An Park For Lease

In 12 months 2013, c ommercial retails, shoebox residences and mass market properties continued to be the celebrities of the property market. Models are snapped up in report time and at document breaking prices. Builders are having fun with overwhelming demand and patrons need more. We feel that these segments of the property market are booming is a repercussion of the property cooling measures no.6 and no. 7. With additional buyer's stamp responsibility imposed on residential properties, buyers change their focus to commercial and industrial properties. I imagine every property purchasers need their property funding to understand in value. There are various ways to define cohomology groups (for example singular cohomology, Čech cohomology, Alexander–Spanier cohomology or Sheaf cohomology). These give different answers for some exotic spaces, but there is a large class of spaces on which they all agree. This is most easily understood axiomatically: there is a list of properties known as the Eilenberg–Steenrod axioms, and any two constructions that share those properties will agree at least on all finite CW complexes, for example.

One of the axioms is the so-called dimension axiom: if P is a single point, then Hn(P) = 0 for all n ≠ 0, and H0(P) = Z. We can generalise slightly by allowing an arbitrary abelian group A in dimension zero, but still insisting that the groups in nonzero dimension are trivial. It turns out that there is again an essentially unique system of groups satisfying these axioms, which are denoted by . In the common case where each group Hk(X) is isomorphic to Zrk for some rk in N, we just have . In general, the relationship between Hk(X) and is only a little more complicated, and is again controlled by the Universal coefficient theorem.

More significantly, we can drop the dimension axiom altogether. There are a number of different ways to define groups satisfying all the other axioms, including the following:

These are called generalised homology theories; they carry much richer information than ordinary homology, but are often harder to compute. Their study is tightly linked (via the Brown representability theorem) to stable homotopy.

A cohomology theory E is said to be multiplicative if is a graded ring.

Other cohomology theories

Theories in a broader sense of cohomology include:[2] Organisational Psychologist Alfonzo Lester from Timmins, enjoys pinochle, property developers in new launch singapore property and textiles. Gets motivation through travel and just spent 7 days at Alejandro de Humboldt National Park.

42 year-old Environmental Consultant Merle Eure from Hudson, really loves snowboarding, property developers in new launch ec singapore and cosplay. Maintains a trip blog and has lots to write about after visiting Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (formerly Victoria Terminus).

See also

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  • Hatcher, A. (2001) "Algebraic Topology", Cambridge U press, England: Cambridge, p. 198, ISBN 0-521-79160-X and ISBN 0-521-79540-0.
  • Hazewinkel, M. (ed.) (1988) Encyclopaedia of Mathematics: An Updated and Annotated Translation of the Soviet "Mathematical Encyclopaedia" Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, p. 68, ISBN 1-55608-010-7 (or direct link Other Sports Official Kull from Drumheller, has hobbies such as telescopes, property developers in singapore and crocheting. Identified some interesting places having spent 4 months at Saloum Delta.

    my web-site http://himerka.com/).
  • E. Cline, B. Parshall, L. Scott and W. van der Kallen, (1977) "Rational and generic cohomology" Inventiones Mathematicae 39(2): pp. 143–163.
  • Asadollahi, Javad and Salarian, Shokrollah (2007) "Cohomology theories for complexes" Journal of Pure & Applied Algebra 210(3): pp. 771–787.

ru:Гомология (топология)#Когомологии

  1. Spanier, E. H. (2000) "Book reviews: Foundations of Algebraic Topology" Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 37(1): pp. 114–115
  2. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http://www.geocities.com/jefferywinkler2/ktheory3.html&date=2009-10-26+00:45:56