<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=72.37.249.196</id>
	<title>formulasearchengine - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=72.37.249.196"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/72.37.249.196"/>
	<updated>2026-08-15T16:02:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Seasonal_energy_efficiency_ratio&amp;diff=10159</id>
		<title>Seasonal energy efficiency ratio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.formulasearchengine.com/w/index.php?title=Seasonal_energy_efficiency_ratio&amp;diff=10159"/>
		<updated>2014-01-27T15:50:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;72.37.249.196: /* US Government SEER Requirement Changes for 2015 */  Minor Edit, changed &amp;quot;benefits&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;benefit&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Refimprove|date=December 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Shephard&#039;s lemma&#039;&#039;&#039; is a major result in [[microeconomics]] having applications in the [[theory of the firm]] and in [[consumer]] choice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |title=Microeconomic Analysis |edition=Third |authorlink=Hal Varian |first=Hal |last=Varian |year=1992 |publisher=Norton |location=New York |isbn=0393957357 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[lemma (mathematics)|lemma]] states that if [[indifference curves]] of the expenditure or [[Cost curve|cost function]] are [[convex function|convex]], then the cost minimizing point of a given good (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) with [[price]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is unique.  The idea is that a [[consumer]] will buy a unique ideal amount of each item to minimize the price for obtaining a certain level of [[utility]] given the price of goods in the [[market]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lemma is named after [[Ronald Shephard]] who gave a [[Mathematical proof|proof]] using the distance formula in his book &#039;&#039;Theory of Cost and Production Functions&#039;&#039; (Princeton University Press, 1953).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equivalent result in the context of consumer theory was first derived by [[Lionel W. McKenzie]] in 1957.  It states that the partial derivatives of the expenditure function with respect to the prices of goods equal the [[Hicksian demand function]]s for the relevant goods.  Similar results had already been derived by [[John Hicks]] (1939) and [[Paul Samuelson]] (1947).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definition==&lt;br /&gt;
In [[consumer]] theory, Shephard&#039;s lemma states that the [[demand]] for a particular good &#039;&#039;i&#039;&#039; for a given level of utility &#039;&#039;u&#039;&#039; and given prices &#039;&#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;&#039;, equals the derivative of the [[expenditure function]] with respect to the price of the relevant good:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h_i(\mathbf{p}, u) = \frac{\partial e (\mathbf{p}, u)}{ \partial p_i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;h&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;&#039;,u)&#039;&#039; is the [[Hicksian demand]] for good &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &#039;&#039;e(&#039;&#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;&#039;,u)&#039;&#039; is the [[expenditure function]], and both functions are in terms of prices (a [[Vector (geometric)|vector]] &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;p&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;) and utility &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Likewise, in the [[theory of the firm]], the lemma gives a similar formulation for the [[Conditional factor demands|conditional factor demand]] for each input factor: the derivative of the cost function &#039;&#039;c(&#039;&#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039;&#039;,y)&#039;&#039; with respect to the factor price:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_i(\mathbf{w}, y) = \frac{\partial c (\mathbf{w}, y)}{ \partial w_i}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &#039;&#039;x&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&#039;&#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039;&#039;,y)&#039;&#039; is the [[conditional factor demands|conditional factor demand]] for input &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &#039;&#039;c(&#039;&#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039;&#039;,y)&#039;&#039; is the cost function, and both functions are in terms of factor prices (a [[Vector (geometric)|vector]] &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;) and output &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Shephard&#039;s original proof used the distance formula, modern proofs of the Shephard&#039;s lemma use the [[envelope theorem]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proof for the Differentiable Case==&lt;br /&gt;
The proof is stated for the two-good case for ease of notation. The expenditure function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e(p_{1},p_{2},u)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the minimand of the constrained optimization problem characterized by the following Lagrangian:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{L}=p_{1}x_{1} + p_{2}x_{2} + \lambda(u-U(x_{1},x_{2})) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the [[envelope theorem]] the derivatives of the minimand &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e(p_{1},p_{2},u)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with respect to the parameter &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_{1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be computed as such:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{\partial e}{\partial p_{1}}=\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial p_{1}}=x_{1}^{h} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x_{1}^{h}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the minimizer (i.e. the Hicksian demand function for good 1). This completes the proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Application==&lt;br /&gt;
Shephard&#039;s lemma gives a relationship between expenditure (or cost) functions and Hicksian demand.  The lemma can be re-expressed as [[Roy&#039;s identity]], which gives a relationship between an [[indirect utility function]] and a corresponding [[Marshallian demand function]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hotelling&#039;s lemma]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Convex preferences]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Shephard&#039;s Lemma}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Underlying principles of microeconomic behavior]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lemmas]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>72.37.249.196</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>