Stable polynomial

From formulasearchengine
Revision as of 22:01, 2 November 2013 by 99.153.64.179 (talk) (oops typo criterium->criterion)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, the Barnes G-function G(z) is a function that is an extension of superfactorials to the complex numbers. It is related to the Gamma function, the K-function and the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant, and was named after mathematician Ernest William Barnes.[1] Up to elementary factors, it is a special case of the double gamma function.


Formally, the Barnes G-function is defined in the following Weierstrass product form:


G(1+z)=(2π)z/2exp(−z+z2(1+γ)2)∏k=1∞(1+zk)kexp(z22k−z)


where γ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant, exp(x) = ex, and ∏ is capital pi notation.


Functional equation and integer arguments

The Barnes G-function satisfies the functional equation


G(z+1)=Γ(z)G(z)


with normalisation G(1) = 1. Note the similarity between the functional equation of the Barnes G-function and that of the Euler Gamma function:


Γ(z+1)=zΓ(z)


The functional equation implies that G takes the following values at integer arguments:


G(n)={0if n=0,−1,−2,…∏i=0n−2i!if n=1,2,…


and thus

G(n)=(Γ(n))n−1K(n)


where Γ(x) denotes the Gamma function and K denotes the K-function. The functional equation uniquely defines the G function if the convexity condition: d3dx3G(x)≥0 is added.[2]

Reflection formula 1.0

The difference equation for the G function, in conjunction with the functional equation for the Gamma function, can be used to obtain the following reflection formula for the Barnes G function (originally proved by Hermann Kinkelin):


log⁡G(1−z)=log⁡G(1+z)−zlog⁡2π+∫0zπxcot⁡πxdx.


The logtangent integral on the right-hand side can be evaluated in terms of the Clausen function (of order 2), as is shown below:


2πlog⁡(G(1−z)G(1+z))=2πzlog⁡(sin⁡πzπ)+Cl2(2πz)


The proof of this result hinges on the following evaluation of the cotangent integral: introducing the notation Lc(z) for the logtangent integral, and using the fact that (d/dx)log⁡(sin⁡πx)=πcot⁡πx, an integration by parts gives


Lc(z)=∫0zπxlog⁡(sin⁡πx)dx=zlog⁡(sin⁡πz)−∫0zlog⁡(sin⁡πx)dx=


zlog⁡(sin⁡πz)−∫0z[log⁡(2sin⁡πx)−log⁡2]dx=


zlog⁡(2sin⁡πz)−∫0zlog⁡(2sin⁡πx)dx


Performing the integral substitution y=2πx⇒dx=dy/(2π) gives


zlog⁡(2sin⁡πz)−12π∫02πzlog⁡(2sin⁡πy2)dy


The Clausen function - of second order - has the integral representation


Cl2(θ)=−∫0θlog⁡|2sin⁡x2|dx


However, within the interval 0<θ<2π, the absolute value sign within the integrand can be omitted, since within the range the 'half-sine' function in the integral is strictly positive, and strictly non-zero. Comparing this definition with the result above for the logtangent itegral, the following relation clearly holds:


Lc(z)=zlog⁡(2sin⁡πz)+12πCl2(2πz)


Thus, after a slight rearrangement of terms, the proof is complete:


2πlog⁡(G(1−z)G(1+z))=2πzlog⁡(sin⁡πzπ)+Cl2(2πz).◻


Using the relation G(1+z)=Γ(z)G(z) and dividing the reflection formula by a factor of 2π gives the equivalent form:


log⁡(G(1−z)G(z))=zlog⁡(sin⁡πzπ)+log⁡Γ(z)+12πCl2(2πz)


Ref: see Adamchik below for an equivalent form of the reflection formula, but with a different proof.

Reflection formula 2.0

Replacing z with (1/2)-z in the previous reflection formula gives, after some simplification, the equivalent formula shown below (involving Bernoulli polynomials):


log⁡(G(12+z)G(12−z))=


log⁡Γ(12−z)+B1(z)log⁡2π−12log⁡2+π∫0zB1(x)tan⁡πxdx


Taylor series expansion

By Taylor's theorem, and considering the logarithmic derivatives of the Barnes function, the following series expansion can be obtained:


log⁡G(1+z)=z2log⁡2π−(z+(1+γ)z22)+∑k=2∞(−1)kζ(k)k+1zk+1


It is valid for 0<z<1. Here, ζ(x) is the Riemann Zeta function:


ζ(x)=∑k=1∞1kx


Exponentiating both sides of the Taylor expansion gives:


G(1+z)=exp⁡[z2log⁡2π−(z+(1+γ)z22)+∑k=2∞(−1)kζ(k)k+1zk+1]=


(2π)z/2exp(−z+(1+γ)z22)exp⁡[∑k=2∞(−1)kζ(k)k+1zk+1]


Comparing this with the Weierstrass product form of the Barnes function gives the following relation:


exp⁡[∑k=2∞(−1)kζ(k)k+1zk+1]=∏k=1∞(1+zk)kexp(z22k−z)

Multiplication formula

Like the Gamma function, the G-function also has a multiplication formula:[3]


G(nz)=K(n)nn2z2/2−nz(2π)−n2−n2z∏i=0n−1∏j=0n−1G(z+i+jn)


where K(n) is a constant given by:


K(n)=e−(n2−1)ζ′(−1)⋅n512⋅(2π)(n−1)/2=(Ae−112)n2−1⋅n512⋅(2π)(n−1)/2.


Here ζ′ is the derivative of the Riemann zeta function and A is the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant.

Asymptotic expansion

The logarithm of G(z + 1) has the following asymptotic expansion, as established by Barnes:


log⁡G(z+1)=


112−log⁡A+z2log⁡2π+(z22−112)log⁡z−3z24+∑k=1NB2k+24k(k+1)z2k+O(1z2N+2).


Here the Bk are the Bernoulli numbers and A is the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant. (Note that somewhat confusingly at the time of Barnes [4] the Bernoulli number B2k would have been written as (−1)k+1Bk, but this convention is no longer current.) This expansion is valid for z in any sector not containing the negative real axis with |z| large.

Relation to the Loggamma integral

The parametric Loggamma can be evaluated in terms of the Barnes G-function (Ref: this result is found in Adamchik below, but stated without proof):


∫0zlog⁡Γ(x)dx=z(1−z)2+z2log⁡2π+zlog⁡Γ(z)−log⁡G(1+z)


The proof is somewhat indirect, and involves first considering the logarithmic difference of the Gamma function and Barnes G-function:

zlog⁡Γ(z)−log⁡G(1+z)


Where


1Γ(z)=zeγ∏k=1∞(1+zk)e−z/k


and γ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.


Taking the logarithm of the Weierstrass product forms of the Barnes function and Gamma function gives:


zlog⁡Γ(z)−log⁡G(1+z)=−zlog⁡(1Γ(z))−log⁡G(1+z)=


−z[log⁡z+γz+∑k=1∞{log⁡(1+zk)−zk}]


−[z2log⁡2π−z2−z22−z2γ2+∑k=1∞{klog⁡(1+zk)+z22k−z}]


A little simplification and re-ordering of terms gives the series expansion:


∑k=1∞{(k+z)log⁡(1+zk)−z22k−z}=


−zlog⁡z−z2log⁡2π+z2+z22−z2γ2−zlog⁡Γ(z)+log⁡G(1+z)


Finally, take the logarithm of the Weierstrass product form of the Gamma function, and integrate over the interval [0,z] to obtain:


∫0zlog⁡Γ(x)dx=−∫0zlog⁡(1Γ(x))dx=


−(zlog⁡z−z)−z2γ2−∑k=1∞{(k+z)log⁡(1+zk)−z22k−z}


Equating the two evaluations completes the proof:


∫0zlog⁡Γ(x)dx=z(1−z)2+z2log⁡2π+zlog⁡Γ(z)−log⁡G(1+z).◻

References

  1. ↑ E.W.Barnes, "The theory of the G-function", Quarterly Journ. Pure and Appl. Math. 31 (1900), 264–314.
  2. ↑ M. F. Vignéras, L'équation fonctionelle de la fonction zêta de Selberg du groupe mudulaire SL(2,ℤ), Astérisque 61, 235–249 (1979).
  3. ↑ I. Vardi, Determinants of Laplacians and multiple gamma functions, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 19, 493–507 (1988).
  4. ↑ E.T.Whittaker and G.N.Watson, "A course of modern analysis", CUP.